On 05/18/22 at 01:29pm, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 03:01:23PM +0800, Coiby Xu wrote:
> > From: Michal Suchanek <msuchanek@xxxxxxx>
> >
> > commit e23a8020ce4e ("s390/kexec_file: Signature verification prototype")
> > adds support for KEXEC_SIG verification with keys from platform keyring
> > but the built-in keys and secondary keyring are not used.
> >
> > Add support for the built-in keys and secondary keyring as x86 does.
> >
> > Fixes: e23a8020ce4e ("s390/kexec_file: Signature verification prototype")
> > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Cc: Philipp Rudo <prudo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: kexec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Cc: keyrings@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Cc: linux-security-module@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek <msuchanek@xxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: "Lee, Chun-Yi" <jlee@xxxxxxxx>
> > Acked-by: Baoquan He <bhe@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Coiby Xu <coxu@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > arch/s390/kernel/machine_kexec_file.c | 18 +++++++++++++-----
> > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> As far as I can tell this doesn't have any dependency to the other
> patches in this series, so should I pick this up for the s390 tree, or
> how will this go upstream?
Thanks, Heiko.
I want to ask Mimi if this can be taken into KEYS-ENCRYPTED tree.
Otherwise I will ask Andrew to help pick this whole series.
Surely, this patch 4 can be taken into s390 seperately since it's
independent, both looks good.
Thanks
Baoquan
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
