On Wed, 18 May 2022 23:48:28 +0530 "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Since commit d1bcae833b32f1 ("ELF: Don't generate unused section
> symbols") [1], binutils (v2.36+) started dropping section symbols that
> it thought were unused. This isn't an issue in general, but with
> kexec_file.c, gcc is placing kexec_arch_apply_relocations[_add] into a
> separate .text.unlikely section and the section symbol ".text.unlikely"
> is being dropped. Due to this, recordmcount is unable to find a non-weak
> symbol in .text.unlikely to generate a relocation record against.
>
> Address this by dropping the weak attribute from these functions:
> - arch_kexec_apply_relocations() is not overridden by any architecture
> today, so just drop the weak attribute.
> - arch_kexec_apply_relocations_add() is only overridden by x86 and s390.
> Retain the function prototype for those and move the weak
> implementation into the header as a static inline for other
> architectures.
>
> ...
>
Sigh. This patch demonstrates why I like __weak :<
> --- a/include/linux/kexec.h
> +++ b/include/linux/kexec.h
> @@ -229,6 +225,30 @@ extern int crash_exclude_mem_range(struct crash_mem *mem,
> unsigned long long mend);
> extern int crash_prepare_elf64_headers(struct crash_mem *mem, int kernel_map,
> void **addr, unsigned long *sz);
> +
> +#if defined(CONFIG_X86_64) || defined(CONFIG_S390)
Let's avoid listing the architectures here? Better to add
select ARCH_HAVE_ARCH_KEXEC_APPLY_RELOCATIONS_ADD
to arch/<arch>/Kconfig?
Please cc me on any additional work on this.
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
