On 04/08/22 at 05:47pm, Leizhen (ThunderTown) wrote:
>
>
> On 2022/4/8 17:32, Baoquan He wrote:
> > Hi, Lei
> >
> > On 02/27/22 at 11:07am, Zhen Lei wrote:
> >> Changes since [v20]:
> >> 1. Check whether crashkernel=Y,low is incorrectly configured or not configured. Do different processing.
> >> 2. Share the existing description of x86. The configuration of arm64 is the same as that of x86.
> >> 3. Define the value of macro CRASH_ADDR_HIGH_MAX as memblock.current_limit, instead of MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ACCESSIBLE.
> >> 4. To improve readability, some lightweight code adjustments have been made to reserve_craskernel(), including comments.
> >> 5. The defined value of DEFAULT_CRASH_KERNEL_LOW_SIZE reconsiders swiotlb, just like x86, to share documents.
> >
> > 5.18 rc1 is already done, do you have plan to post a new version for
> > reviewing?
>
> Yes, v5.18-rc1 has added a new patch
> commit 031495635b46 ("arm64: Do not defer reserve_crashkernel() for platforms with no DMA memory zones")
> to allow block mapping again, so my patches need to be modified. It should be post next week.
Sounds great, thanks. Just a reminder, please take your time.
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
