On 14/01/2022 09:26, Petr Mladek wrote:
> [...]
> I see. OK, it makes sense to call it after the panic notifiers when
> they are used. It would be nice to mention the above in the commit
> message and explain why the 2nd call is there.
>
> Just an idea. It might be better to move the 1st call below
> if (!_crash_kexec_post_notifiers). It would make it more
> clear that it is intended for this code path. I mean:
>
> if (!_crash_kexec_post_notifiers) {
> /* ... */
> if (kexec_crash_loaded())
> panic_print_sys_info(false);
>
> __crash_kexec(NULL);
> ...
>
> Best Regards,
> Petr
Perfect Petr, thanks again for the very good ideas! I'll work on V3 and
submit today.
Cheers,
Guilherme
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
