On 22/12/2021 08:45, Dave Young wrote: > Hi Guilherme, > > Thanks for you patch. Could you add kexec list for any following up > patches? This could change kdump behavior so let's see if any comments > from kexec list. > > Kudos for the lore+lei tool so that I can catch this by seeing this > coming into Andrews tree :) Hi Dave, I'm really sorry for not adding the kexec list, I forgot. But I will do next time for sure, my apologies. And thanks for taking a look after you noticed that on lore, I appreciate your feedback! > [...] > People may enable kdump crashkernel and panic_print together but > they are not aware the extra panic print could cause kdump not reliable > (in theory). So at least some words in kernel-parameters.txt would > help. > That makes sense, I'll improve that in a follow-up patch, how about that? Indeed it's a good idea to let people be sure that panic_print might affect kdump reliability, although I consider the risk to be pretty low. And I'll loop the kexec list for sure! Cheers, Guilherme _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
