Hi Michal, i finally had the time to take a closer look at the series. Except for the nit in patch 4 and my personal preference in patch 6 the code looks good to me. What I don't like are the commit messages on the first commits. In my opinion they are so short that they are almost useless. For example in patch 2 there is absolutely no explanation why you can simply copy the s390 over to ppc. Or in patch 3 you are silently changing the error code in kexec from EKEYREJECT to ENODATA. So I would appreciate it if you could improve them a little. Thanks Philipp On Thu, 25 Nov 2021 19:02:38 +0100 Michal Suchanek <msuchanek@xxxxxxx> wrote: > Hello, > > This is resend of the KEXEC_SIG patchset. > > The first patch is new because it'a a cleanup that does not require any > change to the module verification code. > > The second patch is the only one that is intended to change any > functionality. > > The rest only deduplicates code but I did not receive any review on that > part so I don't know if it's desirable as implemented. > > The first two patches can be applied separately without the rest. > > Thanks > > Michal > > Michal Suchanek (6): > s390/kexec_file: Don't opencode appended signature check. > powerpc/kexec_file: Add KEXEC_SIG support. > kexec_file: Don't opencode appended signature verification. > module: strip the signature marker in the verification function. > module: Use key_being_used_for for log messages in > verify_appended_signature > module: Move duplicate mod_check_sig users code to mod_parse_sig > > arch/powerpc/Kconfig | 11 +++++ > arch/powerpc/kexec/elf_64.c | 14 ++++++ > arch/s390/kernel/machine_kexec_file.c | 42 ++---------------- > crypto/asymmetric_keys/asymmetric_type.c | 1 + > include/linux/module_signature.h | 1 + > include/linux/verification.h | 4 ++ > kernel/module-internal.h | 2 - > kernel/module.c | 12 +++-- > kernel/module_signature.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++- > kernel/module_signing.c | 33 +++++++------- > security/integrity/ima/ima_modsig.c | 22 ++-------- > 11 files changed, 113 insertions(+), 85 deletions(-) > _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
