Re: [RFC v1 0/8] RFC v1: Kernel handling of CPU and memory hot un/plug for crash

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi, see below.
eric

On 11/24/21 03:02, Baoquan He wrote:
Hi,

On 11/18/21 at 12:49pm, Eric DeVolder wrote:
......
This patchset introduces a generic crash hot un/plug handler that
registers with the CPU and memory notifiers. Upon CPU or memory
changes, this generic handler is invoked and performs important
housekeeping, for example obtaining the appropriate lock, and then
invokes an architecture specific handler to do the appropriate
updates.

In the case of x86_64, the arch specific handler generates a new
elfcorehdr, which reflects the current CPUs and memory regions, into a
buffer. Since purgatory also does an integrity check via hash digests
of the loaded segments, purgatory must also be updated with the new

When I tried to address this with a draft patch, I started with a
different way in which udev rule triggers reloading and only elfcorehdr
segment is updated. The update should be less time consuming. Seems
internal notifier is better in your way. But I didn't update purgatory
since I just skipped the elfcorehdr part when calculate the digest of
segments. The reason from my mind is kernel text, initrd must contribute
most part of the digest, elfcorehdr is much less, and it will simplify
code change more. Doing so let us have no need to touch purgatory at
all. What do you think?

Well certainly if purgatory did not need to be updated, then that simplifies
matters quite a bit!

I do not have any context on the history of including elfcorehdr in the purgatory
integrity check. I do agree with you that checking kernel, initrd, boot_params
is most important. Perhaps allowing the elfcorehdr data structure to change
isn't too bad without including in the integrity check is ok as there is some
sanity checking of it by the capture kernel as it reads it for /proc/vmcore setup.


Still reviewing.

Thank you!


digests. The arch handler also generates a new purgatory into a
buffer, performs the hash digests of the new memory segments, and then
patches purgatory with the new digests.  If all succeeds, then the
elfcorehdr and purgatory buffers over write the existing buffers and
the new kdump image is live and ready to go. No involvement with
userspace at all.


_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec



[Index of Archives]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux