On Mon, Nov 01, 2021 at 04:11:42PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > I seem to remember the consensus when this was reviewed that it was > unnecessary and there is already support for doing something like > this at a more fine grained level so we don't need a new kexec hook. It was a discussion, no consenus :) I still think it is better to solve this in generic code for everybody to re-use than with an hack in the architecture hooks. More and more platforms which enable confidential computing features may need this hook in the future. Regards, -- Jörg Rödel jroedel@xxxxxxx SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH Maxfeldstr. 5 90409 Nürnberg Germany (HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg) Geschäftsführer: Ivo Totev _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
