On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 07:03:27PM +0200, dinhngoc.tu@xxxxxxx wrote: > From: Tu Dinh <dinhngoc.tu@xxxxxxx> > > mem_lower and mem_upper are measured in kilobytes. Thanks, I'm curious to know how the current code could have worked. Do we have some testing to verify this change? > --- > kexec/arch/i386/kexec-mb2-x86.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/kexec/arch/i386/kexec-mb2-x86.c b/kexec/arch/i386/kexec-mb2-x86.c > index 36fef20..0d2e93b 100644 > --- a/kexec/arch/i386/kexec-mb2-x86.c > +++ b/kexec/arch/i386/kexec-mb2-x86.c > @@ -256,8 +256,8 @@ static uint64_t multiboot2_make_mbi(struct kexec_info *info, char *cmdline, int > > tag->type = MULTIBOOT_TAG_TYPE_BASIC_MEMINFO; > tag->size = sizeof (struct multiboot_tag_basic_meminfo); > - tag->mem_lower = mem_lower; > - tag->mem_upper = mem_upper; > + tag->mem_lower = mem_lower >> 10; > + tag->mem_upper = mem_upper >> 10; > ptrorig += ALIGN_UP (tag->size, MULTIBOOT_TAG_ALIGN) / sizeof (*ptrorig); > } > > -- > 2.25.1 > > > _______________________________________________ > kexec mailing list > kexec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec > _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
