The mem_encrypt_active() function has been replaced by prot_guest_has(), so remove the implementation. Since the default implementation of the prot_guest_has() matches the s390 implementation of mem_encrypt_active(), prot_guest_has() does not need to be implemented in s390 (the config option ARCH_HAS_PROTECTED_GUEST is not set). Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx> --- arch/s390/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h | 2 -- 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h index 2542cbf7e2d1..08a8b96606d7 100644 --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h @@ -4,8 +4,6 @@ #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__ -static inline bool mem_encrypt_active(void) { return false; } - int set_memory_encrypted(unsigned long addr, int numpages); int set_memory_decrypted(unsigned long addr, int numpages); -- 2.32.0 _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec