On Mon, 31 May 2021 20:37:49 +0100, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, 31 May 2021 at 11:57, Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > It has been reported that kexec_file doesn't really work on arm64. > > It completely ignores any of the existing reservations, which results > > in the secondary kernel being loaded where the GICv3 LPI tables live, > > or even corrupting the ACPI tables. > > > > Since only crash kernels are imune to this as they use a reserved > > memory region, disable the non-crash kernel use case. Further > > patches will try and restore the functionality. > > > > Reported-by: Moritz Fischer <mdf@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx # 5.10 > > Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@xxxxxxxxxx> > > ... but do we really only need this in 5.10 and not earlier? We *do* need something in earlier kernel (as mentioned in the cover letter), but not this patch (arch_kexec_locate_mem_hole doesn't exist there, so there is nothing to override). I guess that completely disabling CONFIG_KEXEC_FILE on arm64 is the way to go for 5.4 and earlier, as I don't think there is any crash kernel support there. Thanks, M. -- Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible. _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
