On Sat, Apr 17, 2021 at 12:10:21AM +0000, Luis Chamberlain wrote: > freeze_super() holds a write lock, however we wish to also enable > callers which already hold the write lock. To do this provide a helper > and make freeze_super() use it. This way, all that freeze_super() does > now is lock handling and active count management. Can we take a step back and think about this a bit more? freeze_super() has three callers: 1) freeze_bdev 2) ioctl_fsfreeze 3) freeze_store (in gfs2) The first gets its reference from get_active_super, and is the only caller of get_active_super. So IMHO we should just not drop the lock in get_active_super and directly call the unlocked version. The other two really should just call grab_super to get an active reference and s_umount. In other words: I don't think we need both variants, just move the locking and s_active acquisition out of free_super. Same for the thaw side. _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
