Hi, [I’m resending this email as it failed to be sent to certain emails.] > And I think crashkernel=auto could be used as an indicator that user > want the kernel to control the crashkernel size, so some further work > could be done to adjust the crashkernel more accordingly. eg. when > memory encryption is enabled, increase the crashkernel value for the > auto estimation, as it's known to consume more crashkernel memory. > Thanks for the suggestion! I tried to keep it simple and leave it to the user to change Kconfig in case a different range is needed. Based on experience, these ranges work well for most of the regular cases. > > But why not make it arch-independent? This crashkernel=auto idea > should simply work with every arch. Thanks! I’ll be making it arch-independent in the v2 patch. > > I think this rounding may be better moved to the arch specified part > where parse_crashkernel is called? Thanks for the suggestion. Could you please elaborate why do we need to do that? Thanks, Saeed _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec