On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 08:36:43PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 11:44:29AM -0700, Dan Williams wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 12:52 PM <ira.weiny@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > From: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > The kmap() calls in this FS are localized to a single thread. To avoid > > > the over head of global PKRS updates use the new kmap_thread() call. > > > > > > Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nico@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Signed-off-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@xxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > fs/cramfs/inode.c | 10 +++++----- > > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/fs/cramfs/inode.c b/fs/cramfs/inode.c > > > index 912308600d39..003c014a42ed 100644 > > > --- a/fs/cramfs/inode.c > > > +++ b/fs/cramfs/inode.c > > > @@ -247,8 +247,8 @@ static void *cramfs_blkdev_read(struct super_block *sb, unsigned int offset, > > > struct page *page = pages[i]; > > > > > > if (page) { > > > - memcpy(data, kmap(page), PAGE_SIZE); > > > - kunmap(page); > > > + memcpy(data, kmap_thread(page), PAGE_SIZE); > > > + kunmap_thread(page); > > > > Why does this need a sleepable kmap? This looks like a textbook > > kmap_atomic() use case. > > There's a lot of code of this form. Could we perhaps have: > > static inline void copy_to_highpage(struct page *to, void *vfrom, unsigned int size) > { > char *vto = kmap_atomic(to); > > memcpy(vto, vfrom, size); > kunmap_atomic(vto); > } > > in linux/highmem.h ? Christoph had the same idea. I'll work on it. Ira _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec