On 30/09/2020 17:20, Geoff Levand wrote:
Hi,
On 9/30/20 3:36 AM, matthias.bgg@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
--- a/kexec/arch/arm64/include/arch/options.h
+++ b/kexec/arch/arm64/include/arch/options.h
+static uint64_t find_purgatory_sink(const char *console)
+{
+ int fd, ret;
+ char device[255], mem[255];
+ struct stat sb;
+ char buffer[10];
+ uint64_t iomem = 0x0;
+
+ if (!console)
+ return 0;
+
+ ret = snprintf(device, sizeof(device), "/sys/class/tty/%s", console);
+ if (ret < 0 || ret >= sizeof(device)) {
+ fprintf(stderr, "snprintf failed: %s\n", strerror(errno));
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ if (stat(device, &sb) || !S_ISDIR(sb.st_mode)) {
+ fprintf(stderr, "kexec: %s: No valid console found for %s\n",
+ __func__, device);
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ snprintf(mem, sizeof(mem), "%s%s", device, "/iomem_base");
+ if (ret < 0 || ret >= sizeof(mem)) {
Seems this is is just doing the same check again...
Well we have to check snprintf outcome here again. Also sizeof(device) ==
sizeof(mem) we could have the case where the first snprintf fits into the 255
character, while the second, where we add the "/iomem_base" does not.
Or didn't I understand you correctly?
Regards,
Matthias
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec