On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 10:35 PM Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 03:24:36PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > sys_move_pages() is an optional syscall, and once we remove > > the compat version of it in favor of the native one with an > > in_compat_syscall() check, the x32 syscall table refers to > > a __x32_sys_move_pages symbol that may not exist when the > > syscall is disabled. > > > > Change the COND_SYSCALL() definition on x86 to also include > > the redirection for x32. > > > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> > > Adding the x86 maintainers and Brian Gerst. Brian proposed another > problem to the mess that most of the compat syscall handlers used by > x32 here: > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/6/16/664 > > hpa didn't particularly like it, but with your and my pending series > we'll soon use more native than compat syscalls for x32, so something > will need to change.. I'm fine with either solution. _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
