* Chen Zhou <chenzhou10@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > In preparation for supporting reserve_crashkernel_low in arm64 as > x86_64 does, move reserve_crashkernel_low() into kernel/crash_core.c. > > BTW, move x86_64 CRASH_ALIGN to 2M suggested by Dave. CONFIG_PHYSICAL_ALIGN > can be selected from 2M to 16M, move to the same as arm64. > > Signed-off-by: Chen Zhou <chenzhou10@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > arch/x86/include/asm/kexec.h | 24 ++++++++++ > arch/x86/kernel/setup.c | 86 +++--------------------------------- > include/linux/crash_core.h | 3 ++ > include/linux/kexec.h | 2 - > kernel/crash_core.c | 74 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > kernel/kexec_core.c | 17 ------- > 6 files changed, 107 insertions(+), 99 deletions(-) Since the changes are centered around arm64, I suppose the arm64 tree will carry this patchset? Assuming that this is a 100% invariant moving of code that doesn't regress on x86: Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx> Thanks, Ingo _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
