Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> A bug is observed on pseries by taking the following steps on rhel:
^
RHEL
I assume it happens on mainline too?
> -1. drmgr -c mem -r -q 5
> -2. echo c > /proc/sysrq-trigger
>
> And then, the failure looks like:
> kdump: saving to /sysroot//var/crash/127.0.0.1-2020-01-16-02:06:14/
> kdump: saving vmcore-dmesg.txt
> kdump: saving vmcore-dmesg.txt complete
> kdump: saving vmcore
> Checking for memory holes : [ 0.0 %] / Checking for memory holes : [100.0 %] | Excluding unnecessary pages : [100.0 %] \ Copying data : [ 0.3 %] - eta: 38s[ 44.337636] hash-mmu: mm: Hashing failure ! EA=0x7fffba400000 access=0x8000000000000004 current=makedumpfile
> [ 44.337663] hash-mmu: trap=0x300 vsid=0x13a109c ssize=1 base psize=2 psize 2 pte=0xc000000050000504
> [ 44.337677] hash-mmu: mm: Hashing failure ! EA=0x7fffba400000 access=0x8000000000000004 current=makedumpfile
> [ 44.337692] hash-mmu: trap=0x300 vsid=0x13a109c ssize=1 base psize=2 psize 2 pte=0xc000000050000504
> [ 44.337708] makedumpfile[469]: unhandled signal 7 at 00007fffba400000 nip 00007fffbbc4d7fc lr 000000011356ca3c code 2
> [ 44.338548] Core dump to |/bin/false pipe failed
> /lib/kdump-lib-initramfs.sh: line 98: 469 Bus error $CORE_COLLECTOR /proc/vmcore $_mp/$KDUMP_PATH/$HOST_IP-$DATEDIR/vmcore-incomplete
> kdump: saving vmcore failed
>
> * Root cause *
> After analyzing, it turns out that in the current implementation,
> when hot-removing lmb, the KOBJ_REMOVE event ejects before the dt updating as
> the code __remove_memory() comes before drmem_update_dt().
> So in kdump kernel, when read_from_oldmem() resorts to
> pSeries_lpar_hpte_insert() to install hpte, but fails with -2 due to
> non-exist pfn. And finally, low_hash_fault() raise SIGBUS to process, as it
> can be observed "Bus error"
>
> From a viewpoint of listener and publisher, the publisher notifies the
> listener before data is ready. This introduces a problem where udev
> launches kexec-tools (due to KOBJ_REMOVE) and loads a stale dt before
> updating. And in capture kernel, makedumpfile will access the memory based
> on the stale dt info, and hit a SIGBUS error due to an un-existed lmb.
>
> * Fix *
> In order to fix this issue, update dt before __remove_memory(), and
> accordingly the same rule in hot-add path.
>
> This will introduce extra dt updating payload for each involved lmb when hotplug.
> But it should be fine since drmem_update_dt() is memory based operation and
> hotplug is not a hot path.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Hari Bathini <hbathini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Nathan Lynch <nathanl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: linuxppc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: kexec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> ---
> v2 -> v3: rebase onto ppc next-test branch
> ---
> arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c
> index 1a3ac3b..def8cb3f 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c
> @@ -372,6 +372,7 @@ static int dlpar_remove_lmb(struct drmem_lmb *lmb)
> invalidate_lmb_associativity_index(lmb);
> lmb_clear_nid(lmb);
> lmb->flags &= ~DRCONF_MEM_ASSIGNED;
> + drmem_update_dt();
No error checking?
> __remove_memory(nid, base_addr, block_sz);
>
> @@ -607,6 +608,7 @@ static int dlpar_add_lmb(struct drmem_lmb *lmb)
>
> lmb_set_nid(lmb);
> lmb->flags |= DRCONF_MEM_ASSIGNED;
> + drmem_update_dt();
And here ..
>
> block_sz = memory_block_size_bytes();
>
> @@ -625,6 +627,7 @@ static int dlpar_add_lmb(struct drmem_lmb *lmb)
> invalidate_lmb_associativity_index(lmb);
> lmb_clear_nid(lmb);
> lmb->flags &= ~DRCONF_MEM_ASSIGNED;
> + drmem_update_dt();
And here ..
> __remove_memory(nid, base_addr, block_sz);
> }
> @@ -877,9 +880,6 @@ int dlpar_memory(struct pseries_hp_errorlog *hp_elog)
> break;
> }
>
> - if (!rc)
> - rc = drmem_update_dt();
> -
> unlock_device_hotplug();
> return rc;
Whereas previously we did check it.
cheers
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
