On Mon, 2020-07-20 at 11:30 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Sun, Jul 19, 2020 at 6:51 PM Sergey Senozhatsky > <sergey.senozhatsky@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Do I get it right, what you are saying is - when we process a PR_CONT > > message the cont buffer should already contain previous non-LOG_NEWLINE > > and non-PR_CONT message, otherwise it's a bug? > > No. > > I'm saying that the code that does PR_CONT should have done *some* > printing before, otherwise it's at the very least questionable. > > IOW, you can't just randomly start printing with PR_CONT, without > having established _some_ context for it. I believe there are at least a few cases that _only_ use pr_cont to emit complete lines. For example: SEQ_printf in kernel/sched/debug.c _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
