On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 01:23:51PM +0800, Lianbo Jiang wrote: > So, here, let's simplify the logic to improve code readability. If the > KEXEC_SIG_FORCE enabled or kexec lockdown enabled, signature verification > is mandated. Otherwise, we lift the bar for any kernel image. I agree completely; in fact that was my intention when introducing the code, but I got overruled about the return codes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20180119125425.l72meyyc2qtrriwe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/ I like this simplification very much, except this part: > + if (ret) { > + pr_debug("kernel signature verification failed (%d).\n", ret); ... > - pr_notice("kernel signature verification failed (%d).\n", ret); I think the log level should stay at most PR_NOTICE when the verification failure results in rejecting the kernel. Perhaps even lower. In case verification is not enforced and the failure is ignored, KERN_DEBUG seems reasonable. Regards, -- Jiri Bohac <jbohac@xxxxxxx> SUSE Labs, Prague, Czechia _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
