David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >> Maybe we have enough information to fixup the loaded kexec image >> in the kexec_file_load case, we certainly don't in the ordinary >> kexec_load case. > > Yes, that's also what I mentioned in my reply to Baoquan. > >> >> For now I want to stick to the simplest thing we can do which is either >> blocking the memory hotplug operation (if that is possible) or >> dropping the loaded kexec image. > > Yes, the latter is the best for now. It's simple. > > I am suggesting to add explicit callbacks to > add_memory()/remove_memory(), and calling the invalidation from there - > because I see various issues with the memory notifier approach (racy, > false positives, never called if memory is not onlined). Ok so we are in agreement. Correct patch. Wrong trigger condition. Eric _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
