On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 10:59:21AM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> On 05/09/20 at 09:57am, Rafael Aquini wrote:
> > Analogously to the introduction of panic_on_warn, this patch
> > introduces a kernel option named panic_on_taint in order to
> > provide a simple and generic way to stop execution and catch
> > a coredump when the kernel gets tainted by any given taint flag.
> >
> > This is useful for debugging sessions as it avoids rebuilding
> > the kernel to explicitly add calls to panic() or BUG() into
> > code sites that introduce the taint flags of interest.
> > Another, perhaps less frequent, use for this option would be
> > as a mean for assuring a security policy (in paranoid mode)
> > case where no single taint is allowed for the running system.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Qian Cai <cai@xxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Rafael Aquini <aquini@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > Changelog:
> > * v2: get rid of unnecessary/misguided compiler hints (Luis)
> > * v2: enhance documentation text for the new kernel parameter (Randy)
> > * v3: drop sysctl interface, keep it only as a kernel parameter (Luis)
> >
> > Documentation/admin-guide/kdump/kdump.rst | 10 +++++
> > .../admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 15 +++++++
> > include/linux/kernel.h | 2 +
> > kernel/panic.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++
> > kernel/sysctl.c | 9 ++++-
> > 5 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kdump/kdump.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/kdump/kdump.rst
> > index ac7e131d2935..de3cf6d377cc 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kdump/kdump.rst
> > +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kdump/kdump.rst
> > @@ -521,6 +521,16 @@ will cause a kdump to occur at the panic() call. In cases where a user wants
> > to specify this during runtime, /proc/sys/kernel/panic_on_warn can be set to 1
> > to achieve the same behaviour.
> >
> > +Trigger Kdump on add_taint()
> > +============================
> > +
> > +The kernel parameter, panic_on_taint, calls panic() from within add_taint(),
> > +whenever the value set in this bitmask matches with the bit flag being set
> > +by add_taint(). This will cause a kdump to occur at the panic() call.
> > +In cases where a user wants to specify this during runtime,
> > +/proc/sys/kernel/panic_on_taint can be set to a respective bitmask value
> > +to achieve the same behaviour.
> > +
> > Contact
> > =======
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> > index 7bc83f3d9bdf..4a69fe49a70d 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> > @@ -3404,6 +3404,21 @@
> > panic_on_warn panic() instead of WARN(). Useful to cause kdump
> > on a WARN().
> >
> > + panic_on_taint= [KNL] conditionally panic() in add_taint()
> > + Format: <str>
> Changed it as 'Format: <string>' to be
> consistent with the existing other options?
I can resubmit with the change, if it's a strong req and the surgery
cannot be done at merge time.
> > + Specifies, as a string, the TAINT flag set that will
> > + compose a bitmask for calling panic() when the kernel
> > + gets tainted.
> > + See Documentation/admin-guide/tainted-kernels.rst for
> > + details on the taint flags that users can pick to
> > + compose the bitmask to assign to panic_on_taint.
> > + When the string is prefixed with a '-' the bitmask
> > + set in panic_on_taint will be mutually exclusive
> > + with the sysctl knob kernel.tainted, and any attempt
> > + to write to that sysctl will fail with -EINVAL for
> > + any taint value that masks with the flags set for
> > + this option.
> > +
> > crash_kexec_post_notifiers
> > Run kdump after running panic-notifiers and dumping
> > kmsg. This only for the users who doubt kdump always
> > diff --git a/include/linux/kernel.h b/include/linux/kernel.h
> > index 9b7a8d74a9d6..66bc102cb59a 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/kernel.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/kernel.h
> > @@ -528,6 +528,8 @@ extern int panic_on_oops;
> > extern int panic_on_unrecovered_nmi;
> > extern int panic_on_io_nmi;
> > extern int panic_on_warn;
> > +extern unsigned long panic_on_taint;
> > +extern bool panic_on_taint_exclusive;
> > extern int sysctl_panic_on_rcu_stall;
> > extern int sysctl_panic_on_stackoverflow;
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/panic.c b/kernel/panic.c
> > index b69ee9e76cb2..65c62f8a1de8 100644
> > --- a/kernel/panic.c
> > +++ b/kernel/panic.c
> > @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
> > #include <linux/kexec.h>
> > #include <linux/sched.h>
> > #include <linux/sysrq.h>
> > +#include <linux/ctype.h>
> > #include <linux/init.h>
> > #include <linux/nmi.h>
> > #include <linux/console.h>
> > @@ -44,6 +45,8 @@ static int pause_on_oops_flag;
> > static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(pause_on_oops_lock);
> > bool crash_kexec_post_notifiers;
> > int panic_on_warn __read_mostly;
> > +unsigned long panic_on_taint;
> > +bool panic_on_taint_exclusive = false;
> >
> > int panic_timeout = CONFIG_PANIC_TIMEOUT;
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(panic_timeout);
> > @@ -434,6 +437,11 @@ void add_taint(unsigned flag, enum lockdep_ok lockdep_ok)
> > pr_warn("Disabling lock debugging due to kernel taint\n");
> >
> > set_bit(flag, &tainted_mask);
> > +
> > + if (tainted_mask & panic_on_taint) {
> > + panic_on_taint = 0;
>
> This panic_on_taint resetting is redundant? It will trigger crash, do we
> need care if it's 0 or not?
>
We might still get more than one CPU hitting a taint adding code path after
the one that tripped here called panic. To avoid multiple calls to panic,
in that particular scenario, we clear the panic_on_taint bitmask out.
Also, albeit non-frequent, we might be tracking TAINT_WARN, and still hit
a WARN_ON() in the panic / kdump path, thus incurring in a second
(and unwanted) call to panic here.
> > + panic("panic_on_taint set ...");
> > + }
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL(add_taint);
> >
> > @@ -686,3 +694,35 @@ static int __init oops_setup(char *s)
> > return 0;
> > }
> > early_param("oops", oops_setup);
> > +
> > +static int __init panic_on_taint_setup(char *s)
> > +{
> > + /* we just ignore panic_on_taint if passed without flags */
> > + if (!s)
> > + goto out;
> > +
> > + for (; *s; s++) {
> > + int i;
> > +
> > + if (*s == '-') {
> > + panic_on_taint_exclusive = true;
> > + continue;
> > + }
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < TAINT_FLAGS_COUNT; i++) {
> > + if (toupper(*s) == taint_flags[i].c_true) {
> > + set_bit(i, &panic_on_taint);
> > + break;
> > + }
> > + }
>
> Read admin-guide/tainted-kernels.rst, but still do not get what 'G' means.
> If I specify 'panic_on_taint="G"' or 'panic_on_taint="-G"' in cmdline,
> what is expected for this customer behaviour?
>
This will not panic the system as no taint flag gets actually set in
panic_on_taint bitmask for G.
G is the counterpart of P, and appears on print_tainted() whenever
TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE is not set. panic_on_taint doesn't set
anything for G, as it doesn't represent any taint, but the lack
of one particular taint, instead.
(apparently, TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE is the only taint flag
that follows that pattern of having an extra assigned letter
that means its absence, and perhaps it should be removed)
> Except of above minor nitpicks, this patch looks good to me, thanks.
>
> Reviewed-by: Baoquan He <bhe@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Thanks
> Baoquan
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
