> On May 7, 2020, at 6:15 PM, Rafael Aquini <aquini@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > It's a reasonable and self-contained feature that we have a valid use for. > I honestly fail to see it causing that amount of annoyance as you are > suggesting here. It is not a big trouble yet, but keeping an obsolete patch that not very straightforward to figure out that it will be superseded by the panic_on_taint patch will only cause more confusion the longer it has stayed in linux-next. The thing is that even if you can’t get this panic_on_taint (the superior solution) patch accepted for some reasons, someone else could still work on it until it get merged. Thus, I failed to see any possibility we will go back to the inferior solution (mm-slub-add-panic_on_error-to-the-debug-facilities.patch) by all means. _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
