On 04/08/20 at 09:44pm, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: > Baoquan He <bhe@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > On 04/07/20 at 02:04pm, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: > >> Baoquan He <bhe@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> > >> > > >> > The trace is here. > >> > > >> > [ 132.480817] RIP: 0010:crash_vmclear_local_loaded_vmcss+0x57/0xd0 [kvm_intel] > >> > >> This is a known bug, > >> > >> https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20200401081348.1345307-1-vkuznets@xxxxxxxxxx/ > > > > Thanks for telling, Vitaly. > > > > I tested your patch, it works. > > > > One thing is I noticed a warning message when your patch is applied. When > > I changed back to revert this patchset, didn't found this message. I didn't > > look into the detail of network core code and the kvm vmx code, maybe it's > > not relevant. > > > > > > [ 3708.629234] Type was not set for devlink port. > > [ 3708.629258] WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 60 at net/core/devlink.c:7164 devlink_port_type_warn+0x11/0x20 > > [ 3708.632328] Modules linked in: rfkill sunrpc intel_powerclamp coretemp kvm_intel kvm irqbypass intel_cstate iTCO_wdt hpwdt intel_uncore gpio_ich iTCO_vendor_support pcspkr ipmi_ssif hpilo lpc_ich ipmi_si ipmi_devintf ipmi_msghandler acpi_power_meter pcc_cpufreq i7core_edac ip_tables xfs libcrc32c radeon i2c_algo_bit drm_kms_helper cec ttm crc32c_intel serio_raw drm ata_generic pata_acpi mlx4_core bnx2 hpsa scsi_transport_sas > > [ 3708.640782] CPU: 3 PID: 60 Comm: kworker/3:1 Kdump: loaded Tainted: G I 5.6.0+ #1 > > [ 3708.642715] Hardware name: HP ProLiant DL380 G6, BIOS P62 08/16/2015 > > [ 3708.644222] Workqueue: events devlink_port_type_warn > > [ 3708.645349] RIP: 0010:devlink_port_type_warn+0x11/0x20 > > What's in the patchset you're testing? Is it Sean's series + my patch, > or just my patch? In case it's the later I'm having hard times trying to > see how this can be related, but in case it's the former the fact that > we do stuff a little bit differently on kexec may actually be triggering > the issue above. I still think that it's not causing it, just > triggering. I am testing on Linus's tree, this patchset is already there. I just reverted these patchset, or apply your patch on top of it. Both of them works. The devlink warning message is not related to this issue because I found it too when this patchset are reverted. While I would suggest adding kexec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx when code changes are related to kexec/kdump since we usually watch this mailing list. LKML contains too many mails, we may miss this kind of change, have to debug and test again. Thanks. Baoquan _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
