Re: [PATCH 0/2] printk: replace ringbuffer

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2020-02-05, Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> So there is a General protection fault. That's the type of a
>>>> problem that kills the boot for me as well (different backtrace,
>>>> tho).
>>> 
>>> Do you have CONFIG_RELOCATABLE and CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_BASE (KASLR)
>>> enabled?
>> 
>> Yes. These two options are enabled.
>> 
>> CONFIG_RELOCATABLE=y
>> CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_BASE=y
>
> So KASLR kills the boot for me. So does KASAN.

Sergey, thanks for looking into this already!

> John, do you see any of these problems on your test machine?

For x86 I have only been using qemu. (For hardware tests I use arm64-smp
in order to verify memory barriers.) With qemu-x86_64 I am unable to
reproduce the problem.

Lianbo, thanks for the report. Can you share your boot args? Anything
special in there (like log_buf_len=, earlyprintk, etc)?

Also, could you share your CONFIG_LOG_* and CONFIG_PRINTK_* options?

I will move to bare metal x86_64 and hopefully see it as well.

John

_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec



[Index of Archives]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux