RE: [PATCH] makedumpfile/s390: Add get_kaslr_offset() for s390x

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Lianbo,

> -----Original Message-----
> 在 2019年12月26日 11:38, lijiang 写道:
> > Hi, Kazu and Mikhail,
> >
> >> Hi Mikhail,
> >>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> On 12.12.2019 17:12, Kazuhito Hagio wrote:
> >>>> Hi Mikhail,
> >>>>
> >>>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>>> Hello Kazu,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I think we can try to generalize the kaslr offset extraction.
> >>>>> I won't speak for other architectures, but for s390 that get_kaslr_offset_arm64()
> >>>>> should work fine. The only concern of mine is this TODO statement:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> if (_text <= vaddr && vaddr <= _end) {
> >>>>> 	DEBUG_MSG("info->kaslr_offset: %lx\n", info->kaslr_offset);
> >>>>> 	return info->kaslr_offset;
> >>>>> 	} else {
> >>>>> 	/*
> >>>>> 	* TODO: we need to check if it is vmalloc/vmmemmap/module
> >>>>> 	* address, we will have different offset
> >>>>> 	*/
> >>>>> 	return 0;
> >>>>> }
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Could you explain this one?
> >>>>
> >>>> Probably it was considered that the check would be needed to support
> >>>> the whole KASLR behavior when get_kaslr_offset_x86_64() was written
> >>>> originally.
> >>>>
> >>>> But in the current makedumpfile for x86_64 and arm64 supporting KASLR,
> >>>> the offset we need is the one for symbol addresses in vmlinux only.
> >>>> As I said below, module symbol addresses are retrieved from vmcore.
> >>>> Other addresses should not be passed to the function for now, as far
> >>>> as I know.
> >>>>
> >>>> So I think the TODO comment is confusing, and it would be better to
> >>>> remove it or change it to something like:
> >>>> /*
> >>>>  * Returns 0 if vaddr does not need the offset to be added,
> >>>>  * e.g. for module address.
> >>>>  */
> >>>>
> >>>> But if s390 uses get_kaslr_offset() in its arch-specific code to
> >>>> adjust addresses other than kernel text address, we might need to
> >>>> modify it for s390, not generalize it.
> >>>
> >>> Currently, s390 doesn't use get_kaslr_offset() in its arch-specific
> >>> code.
> >>
> >> OK, I pushed a patch that generalizes it to my test repository.
> >> Could you enable s390 to use it and test?
> >> https://github.com/k-hagio/makedumpfile/tree/add-get_kaslr_offset_general
> >>
> >
> > I enabled it on s390 as below and tested, it worked.

Thank you for testing.

> >
> > @@ -1075,7 +1075,7 @@ int is_iomem_phys_addr_s390x(unsigned long addr);
> >  #define get_phys_base()                stub_true()
> >  #define get_machdep_info()     get_machdep_info_s390x()
> >  #define get_versiondep_info()  stub_true()
> > -#define get_kaslr_offset(X)    stub_false()
> > +#define get_kaslr_offset(X)    get_kaslr_offset_general(X)
> >  #define vaddr_to_paddr(X)      vaddr_to_paddr_s390x(X)
> >
> > But, there is still a problem that needs to be improved. In the find_kaslr_offsets(),
> > the value of SYMBOL(_stext) is always 0(zero) and it is passed to the get_kaslr_offset().
> > For the following code in the get_kaslr_offset_general(), it does not work as expected.
> > ...
> > 	if (_text <= vaddr && vaddr <= _end)
> > 		return info->kaslr_offset;
> > 	else
> > 		return 0;

I don't know why the SYMBOL(_stext) is passed to the get_kaslr_offset() there, but
since the return value of get_kaslr_offset() is not used in the find_kaslr_offsets(),
it's meaningless and not harmful. So it is not worth doing READ_SYMBOL(_stext) there
for now.

> 
> In addition, the above code confused me, it will always return 0 on s390(please refer to my logs).

The aim of get_kaslr_offset() here is only setting info->kaslr_offset to the value
from vmcoreinfo for the SYMBOL_INIT() macro.
(get_kaslr_offset() returns the kaslr offset in the resolve_config_entry().)

But yeah, the get_kaslr_offset(SYMBOL(_stext)) is confusing and not good.
Passing 0 might be a bit better..?

Thanks,
Kazu

> 
> Thanks.
> 
> > ...
> > Here is my log:
> > get_kaslr_offset_general: info->kaslr_offset: 67ebc000, _text:100000, _end:10ba000, vaddr:0
> >
> > After applied the following patch, got the expected result.
> >  int
> >  find_kaslr_offsets()
> >  {
> > @@ -3973,6 +4042,11 @@ find_kaslr_offsets()
> >          * called this function between open_vmcoreinfo() and
> >          * close_vmcoreinfo()
> >          */
> > +       READ_SYMBOL("_stext", _stext);
> > +       if (SYMBOL(_stext) == NOT_FOUND_SYMBOL) {
> > +                ERRMSG("Can't get the symbol of _stext.\n");
> > +                goto out;
> > +       }
> >         get_kaslr_offset(SYMBOL(_stext));
> >
> > Here is my log:
> > get_kaslr_offset_general: info->kaslr_offset: 67ebc000, _text:100000, _end:10ba000, vaddr:67fbc000
> >
> > Basically, before using the value of SYMBOL(_stext), need to ensure that the SYMBOL(_stext) is parsed
> > correctly.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> >> Thanks,
> >> Kazu
> >>
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> Kazu
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>> Mikhail
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 09.12.2019 23:02, Kazuhito Hagio wrote:
> >>>>>> Hi Mikhail,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Sorry for late reply.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>>>>> Since kernel v5.2 KASLR is supported on s390. In makedumpfile however no
> >>>>>>> support has been added yet. This patch adds the arch specific function
> >>>>>>> get_kaslr_offset() for s390x.
> >>>>>>> Since the values in vmcoreinfo are already relocated, the patch is
> >>>>>>> mainly relevant for vmlinux processing (-x option).
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> In the current implementation of makedumpfile, the get_kaslr_offset(vaddr)
> >>>>>> is supposed to return the KASLR offset only when the offset is needed to
> >>>>>> add to the vaddr.  So generally symbols from kernel (vmlinux) need it, but
> >>>>>> symbols from modules are resolved dynamically and don't need the offset.
> >>>>> \>
> >>>>>> This patch always returns the offset if any, as a result, I guess this patch
> >>>>>> will not work as expected with module symbols in filter config file.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> So... How about making get_kaslr_offset_arm64() general for other archs
> >>>>>> (get_kaslr_offset_general() or something), then using it also for s390?
> >>>>>> If OK, I can do that generalization.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>> Kazu
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Philipp Rudo <prudo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Zaslonko <zaslonko@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>>>> ---
> >>>>>>>  arch/s390x.c   | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>>>>>>  makedumpfile.h |  3 ++-
> >>>>>>>  2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> diff --git a/arch/s390x.c b/arch/s390x.c
> >>>>>>> index bf9d58e..892df14 100644
> >>>>>>> --- a/arch/s390x.c
> >>>>>>> +++ b/arch/s390x.c
> >>>>>>> @@ -122,6 +122,38 @@ get_machdep_info_s390x(void)
> >>>>>>>  	return TRUE;
> >>>>>>>  }
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> +unsigned long
> >>>>>>> +get_kaslr_offset_s390x(unsigned long vaddr)
> >>>>>>> +{
> >>>>>>> +	unsigned int i;
> >>>>>>> +	char buf[BUFSIZE_FGETS], *endp;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +	if (!info->file_vmcoreinfo)
> >>>>>>> +		return FALSE;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +	if (fseek(info->file_vmcoreinfo, 0, SEEK_SET) < 0) {
> >>>>>>> +		ERRMSG("Can't seek the vmcoreinfo file(%s). %s\n",
> >>>>>>> +		       info->name_vmcoreinfo, strerror(errno));
> >>>>>>> +		return FALSE;
> >>>>>>> +	}
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +	while (fgets(buf, BUFSIZE_FGETS, info->file_vmcoreinfo)) {
> >>>>>>> +		i = strlen(buf);
> >>>>>>> +		if (!i)
> >>>>>>> +			break;
> >>>>>>> +		if (buf[i - 1] == '\n')
> >>>>>>> +			buf[i - 1] = '\0';
> >>>>>>> +		if (strncmp(buf, STR_KERNELOFFSET,
> >>>>>>> +			    strlen(STR_KERNELOFFSET)) == 0) {
> >>>>>>> +			info->kaslr_offset =
> >>>>>>> +				strtoul(buf + strlen(STR_KERNELOFFSET), &endp, 16);
> >>>>>>> +			DEBUG_MSG("info->kaslr_offset: %lx\n", info->kaslr_offset);
> >>>>>>> +		}
> >>>>>>> +	}
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +	return info->kaslr_offset;
> >>>>>>> +}
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>  static int
> >>>>>>>  is_vmalloc_addr_s390x(unsigned long vaddr)
> >>>>>>>  {
> >>>>>>> diff --git a/makedumpfile.h b/makedumpfile.h
> >>>>>>> index ac11e90..26f6247 100644
> >>>>>>> --- a/makedumpfile.h
> >>>>>>> +++ b/makedumpfile.h
> >>>>>>> @@ -1071,11 +1071,12 @@ unsigned long long vaddr_to_paddr_ppc(unsigned long vaddr);
> >>>>>>>  int get_machdep_info_s390x(void);
> >>>>>>>  unsigned long long vaddr_to_paddr_s390x(unsigned long vaddr);
> >>>>>>>  int is_iomem_phys_addr_s390x(unsigned long addr);
> >>>>>>> +unsigned long get_kaslr_offset_s390x(unsigned long vaddr);
> >>>>>>>  #define find_vmemmap()		stub_false()
> >>>>>>>  #define get_phys_base()		stub_true()
> >>>>>>>  #define get_machdep_info()	get_machdep_info_s390x()
> >>>>>>>  #define get_versiondep_info()	stub_true()
> >>>>>>> -#define get_kaslr_offset(X)	stub_false()
> >>>>>>> +#define get_kaslr_offset(X)	get_kaslr_offset_s390x(X)
> >>>>>>>  #define vaddr_to_paddr(X)	vaddr_to_paddr_s390x(X)
> >>>>>>>  #define paddr_to_vaddr(X)	paddr_to_vaddr_general(X)
> >>>>>>>  #define is_phys_addr(X)		is_iomem_phys_addr_s390x(X)
> >>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>> 2.17.1
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> kexec mailing list
> >> kexec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
> >>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > kexec mailing list
> > kexec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
> >
> 

_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec




[Index of Archives]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux