Hi Prarit, On 2019-12-05, Prarit Bhargava <prarit@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Based on the comments there is going to be a v6 but in any case I am > starting testing of this patchset on several large core systems across > multiple architectures (x86_64, ARM64, s390, ppc64le). Some of those > systems are known to fail boot due to the large amount of printk output so > it will be good to see if these changes resolve those issues. Right now the patches only include the ringbuffer as a separate entity with a test module. So they do not yet have any effect on printk. If you apply the patches and then build the "modules" target, you will have a new test_prb.ko module. Loading that module will start some heavy testing of the ringbuffer. As long as the testing is successful, the module will keep testing. During this time the machine will be very slow, but should still respond. The test can be stopped by unloading the module. If the test stops on its own, then a problem was found. The output of the test is put into the ftrace buffer. It would be nice if you could run the test module on some fat machines, at least for a few minutes to see if anything explodes. ARM64 and ppc64le will probably be the most interesting, due to memory barrier testing. Otherwise I will definitely be reaching out to you when we are ready to perform actual printk testing with the newly agreed up semantics (lockless, per-console printing threads, synchronous panic consoles). Thanks for your help with this. John Ogness _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
