Re: [PATCHv2 0/4] x86/mce: protect nr_cpus from rebooting by broadcast mce

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 11:02:19AM +0800, Pingfan Liu wrote:
> v1 -> v2: fix compile warning and error on x86_32
> 
> 
> This series include two related groups:
> [1-3/4]: protect nr_cpus from rebooting by broadcast mce
> [4/4]: improve "kexec -l" robustness against broadcast mce
> 
> When I tried to fix [1], Thomas raised concern about the nr_cpus' vulnerability
> to unexpected rebooting by broadcast mce. After analysis, I think only the
> following first case suffers from the rebooting by broadcast mce. [1-3/4] aims
> to fix that issue.
> 
> *** Back ground ***
> 
> On x86 it's required to have all logical CPUs set CR4.MCE=1. Otherwise, a
> broadcast MCE observing CR4.MCE=0b on any core will shutdown the machine.
> 
> The option 'nosmt' has already complied with the above rule by Thomas's patch.
> For detail, refer to 506a66f3748 (Revert "x86/apic: Ignore secondary threads if
> nosmt=force")
> 
> But for nr_cpus option, the exposure to broadcast MCE is a little complicated,
> and can be categorized into three cases.

One thing is not clear to me: are you "fixing" a hypothetical case here
or have you *actually* experienced an MCE happening while kdumping with
nr_cpus < num_online_cpus()?

Btw, pls do not use lkml.org to refer to previous mails but

http://lkml.kernel.org/r/<Message-ID>

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.

_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec



[Index of Archives]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux