Re: [RFC PATCH v4 9/9] printk: use a new ringbuffer implementation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08/16/19 at 01:46pm, Dave Young wrote:
> John, can you cc kexec list for your later series?
> 
> On 08/08/19 at 12:32am, John Ogness wrote:
> > This is a major change because the API (and underlying workings)
> > of the new ringbuffer are completely different than the previous
> > ringbuffer. Since there are several components of the printk
> > infrastructure that use the ringbuffer API (console, /dev/kmsg,
> > syslog, kmsg_dump), there are quite a few changes throughout the
> > printk implementation.
> > 
> > This is also a conservative change because it continues to use the
> > logbuf_lock raw spinlock even though the new ringbuffer is lockless.
> > 
> > The externally visible changes are:
> > 
> > 1. The exported vmcore info has changed:
> > 
> >     - VMCOREINFO_SYMBOL(log_buf);
> >     - VMCOREINFO_SYMBOL(log_buf_len);
> >     - VMCOREINFO_SYMBOL(log_first_idx);
> >     - VMCOREINFO_SYMBOL(clear_idx);
> >     - VMCOREINFO_SYMBOL(log_next_idx);
> >     + VMCOREINFO_SYMBOL(printk_rb_static);
> >     + VMCOREINFO_SYMBOL(printk_rb_dynamic);
> 
> I assumed this needs some userspace work in kexec,  how did you test
> them?
> 
> makedumpfile should need changes to dump the kernel log.
> 
> Also kexec-tools includes a vmcore-dmesg.c to extrace dmesg from
> /proc/vmcore.
> 
> > 
> > 2. For the CONFIG_PPC_POWERNV powerpc platform, kernel log buffer
> >    registration is no longer available because there is no longer
> >    a single contigous block of memory to represent all of the
> >    ringbuffer.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: John Ogness <john.ogness@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal.c |  22 +-
> >  include/linux/kmsg_dump.h             |   6 +-
> >  include/linux/printk.h                |  12 -
> >  kernel/printk/printk.c                | 745 ++++++++++++++------------
> >  kernel/printk/ringbuffer.h            |  24 +
> >  5 files changed, 415 insertions(+), 394 deletions(-)
> > 

[snip]

Seems kexec list has 40k limitation for msg body.  Simon and David, maybe it is
too small?

Thanks
Dave

_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec



[Index of Archives]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux