On 07/29/19 at 02:14pm, Vasily Gorbik wrote:
> arch_kexec_kernel_image_probe function declaration has been removed by
> commit 9ec4ecef0af7 ("kexec_file,x86,powerpc: factor out kexec_file_ops
> functions"). Still this function is overridden by couple of architectures
> and proper prototype declaration is therefore important, so bring it
> back. This fixes the following sparse warning on s390:
> arch/s390/kernel/machine_kexec_file.c:333:5: warning: symbol 'arch_kexec_kernel_image_probe' was not declared. Should it be static?
>
> Signed-off-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> include/linux/kexec.h | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/kexec.h b/include/linux/kexec.h
> index 1740fe36b5b7..f7529d120920 100644
> --- a/include/linux/kexec.h
> +++ b/include/linux/kexec.h
> @@ -183,6 +183,8 @@ int kexec_purgatory_get_set_symbol(struct kimage *image, const char *name,
> bool get_value);
> void *kexec_purgatory_get_symbol_addr(struct kimage *image, const char *name);
>
> +int __weak arch_kexec_kernel_image_probe(struct kimage *image, void *buf,
> + unsigned long buf_len);
> void * __weak arch_kexec_kernel_image_load(struct kimage *image);
> int __weak arch_kexec_apply_relocations_add(struct purgatory_info *pi,
> Elf_Shdr *section,
> --
> 2.21.0
>
Acked-by: Dave Young <dyoung@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks
Dave
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
