On Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 02:29:56PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Tue, 2019-07-02 at 13:09 +0200, Simon Horman wrote: > > > diff --git a/include/x86/multiboot2.h b/include/x86/multiboot2.h > > > new file mode 100644 > > > index 0000000..5693923 > > > --- /dev/null > > > +++ b/include/x86/multiboot2.h > > > @@ -0,0 +1,416 @@ > > > +/* multiboot2.h - Multiboot 2 header file. */ > > > +/* Copyright (C) 1999,2003,2007,2008,2009,2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc. > > > + * > > > + * Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy > > > + * of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to > > > + * deal in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the > > > + * rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or > > > + * sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is > > > + * furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions: > > > + * > > > + * The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in > > > + * all copies or substantial portions of the Software. > > > + * > > > + * THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR > > > + * IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, > > > + * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL ANY > > > + * DEVELOPER OR DISTRIBUTOR BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY, > > > + * WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR > > > + * IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE. > > > + */ > > > > As per my comment on your previous posting of this patch: > > > > multiboot2.h does not appear to be licenced as GPLv2. > > This seems incompatible with inclusion in kexec-tools. > > Can we discuss this? > > Er... why do you say that isn't GPL-compatible? It's just a standard > MIT licence, isn't it? Thanks David, this is kind of what I meant by discuss. Taking a look over the FSF site this morning I agree that: a) this is the MIT license; and b) it is compatible with GPLv2 With that in mind I have no objections to this series and have applied it for inclusion in kexec v2.0.20. _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
