Hi Michael, On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 12:04:11PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote: > Sven Schnelle <svens@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > https://github.com/linuxppc/wiki/wiki/Booting-with-Qemu > > But I'm not sure where you get a version of kexec that uses kexec_file(). kexec-tools HEAD supports it, so that's not a problem. > > If that change is acceptable i would finish the patch and submit it. I think > > best would be to push this change through Helge's parisc tree, so we don't > > have any dependencies to sort out. > > That will work for you but could cause us problems if we have any > changes that touch that code. > > It's easy enough to create a topic branch with just that patch that both > of us merge. What should be the base branch for that patch? Christophe suggested the powerpc/merge branch? > > #include <linux/elf.h> > > #include <linux/kexec.h> > > #include <linux/libfdt.h> > > @@ -31,540 +29,6 @@ > > #include <linux/slab.h> > > #include <linux/types.h> > > > > -#define PURGATORY_STACK_SIZE (16 * 1024) > > This is unused AFAICS. We should probably remove it explicitly rather > than as part of this patch. I have one patch right now. If wanted i can split up all the changes suggested during the review into smaller pieces, whatever you prefer. > Or that. > > > +#include <linux/slab.h> > > +#include <linux/types.h> > > + > > +#define elf_addr_to_cpu elf64_to_cpu > > Why are we doing that rather than just using elf64_to_cpu directly? > > > +#ifndef Elf_Rel > > +#define Elf_Rel Elf64_Rel > > +#endif /* Elf_Rel */ > > And that? Don't know - ask the PPC people :-) Regards Sven _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
