> > And kexec doesn't print many messages. When 'kexec -e' is executed, > > much critical work need be done in 1st kernel, and also in 2nd kernel > > till printed messages are seen. Sometime it could hang there without a > > notice, because we need shutdown all devices before it. Keeping it can > > at least tell which stage it is? > > > > No strong objection, just we may need enable it manually if silent > > hang is met. Anyone has different opinion? > > Please ignore this mail, I must be dizzy. pr_notice looks good to me. > Thank you for looking at this. Pasha _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
