On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 02:56:48PM +0800, Lianbo Jiang wrote: > When doing kexec_file_load(), the first kernel needs to pass the e820 > reserved ranges to the second kernel, because some devices may use it > in kdump kernel, such as PCI devices. > > But, the kernel can not exactly match the e820 reserved ranges when > walking through the iomem resources via the 'IORES_DESC_NONE', because > there are several types of e820 that are described as the 'IORES_DESC_NONE' > type. Please refer to the e820_type_to_iores_desc(). > > Therefore, add a new I/O resource descriptor 'IORES_DESC_RESERVED' for > the iomem resources search interfaces. It is helpful to exactly match > the reserved resource ranges when walking through iomem resources. > > In addition, since the new descriptor 'IORES_DESC_RESERVED' has been > created for the reserved areas, the code originally related to the > descriptor 'IORES_DESC_NONE' also need to be updated. > > Suggested-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Lianbo Jiang <lijiang@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > arch/x86/kernel/e820.c | 2 +- > arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c | 16 ++++++++++++++-- > include/linux/ioport.h | 1 + > 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c b/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c > index 2879e234e193..16fcde196243 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c > @@ -1050,10 +1050,10 @@ static unsigned long __init e820_type_to_iores_desc(struct e820_entry *entry) > case E820_TYPE_NVS: return IORES_DESC_ACPI_NV_STORAGE; > case E820_TYPE_PMEM: return IORES_DESC_PERSISTENT_MEMORY; > case E820_TYPE_PRAM: return IORES_DESC_PERSISTENT_MEMORY_LEGACY; > + case E820_TYPE_RESERVED: return IORES_DESC_RESERVED; > case E820_TYPE_RESERVED_KERN: /* Fall-through: */ > case E820_TYPE_RAM: /* Fall-through: */ > case E820_TYPE_UNUSABLE: /* Fall-through: */ > - case E820_TYPE_RESERVED: /* Fall-through: */ > default: return IORES_DESC_NONE; > } > } > diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c b/arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c > index 0029604af8a4..5671ec24df49 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c > +++ b/arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c > @@ -81,9 +81,21 @@ static bool __ioremap_check_ram(struct resource *res) > return false; > } > > -static int __ioremap_check_desc_other(struct resource *res) I can see this patch doesn't build even without applying and building it. How about you build-test your stuff before submitting? -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply. _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec