Hi Bhupesh, -----Original Message----- > I am not sure you got a chance to look at the two regression cases I > reported here: > <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/kexec/2019-February/022449.html> > > Unfortunately the above suggestion doesn't provide any fix for > ARMv8.2-LPA regression (see text under heading ' > (1). Regression Case 1 (ARMv8.2-LPA enabled kernel)') As for MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS, I realized that ppc64 makedumpfile can detect it because there is only one SECTION_SIZE_BITS for ppc64. I think we can use the same way as set_ppc64_max_physmem_bits() does also for arm64 for now. I'm going to write it for kernels not having NUMBER(MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS) in vmcoreinfo. Thanks, Kazu > > After going through the regression reports, I think exporting > 'MAX_USER_VA_BITS' and 'MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS' to vmcoreinfo is sufficient > for the above regressions (without over-complicating the stuff) as > ARM64_TCR.T1SZ and friends seem to arch specific as compared to > VA_BITS + 'MAX_USER_VA_BITS' . > > Thanks, > Bhupesh _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
