RE: [PATCH 2/2] Remove the memory encryption mask to obtain the true physical address

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 1/22/2019 3:03 AM, Lianbo Jiang wrote:
> For AMD machine with SME feature, if SME is enabled in the first
> kernel, the crashed kernel's page table(pgd/pud/pmd/pte) contains
> the memory encryption mask, so makedumpfile needs to remove the
> memory encryption mask to obtain the true physical address.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lianbo Jiang <lijiang@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/x86_64.c  | 3 +++
>  makedumpfile.c | 1 +
>  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86_64.c b/arch/x86_64.c
> index 537fb78..7651d36 100644
> --- a/arch/x86_64.c
> +++ b/arch/x86_64.c
> @@ -346,6 +346,7 @@ __vtop4_x86_64(unsigned long vaddr, unsigned long pagetable)
>  			return NOT_PADDR;
>  		}
>  		pud_paddr  = pgd & ENTRY_MASK;
> +		pud_paddr = pud_paddr & ~(NUMBER(sme_mask));
>  	}
> 
>  	/*
> @@ -371,6 +372,7 @@ __vtop4_x86_64(unsigned long vaddr, unsigned long pagetable)
>  	 * Get PMD.
>  	 */
>  	pmd_paddr  = pud_pte & ENTRY_MASK;
> +	pmd_paddr = pmd_paddr & ~(NUMBER(sme_mask));
>  	pmd_paddr += pmd_index(vaddr) * sizeof(unsigned long);
>  	if (!readmem(PADDR, pmd_paddr, &pmd_pte, sizeof pmd_pte)) {
>  		ERRMSG("Can't get pmd_pte (pmd_paddr:%lx).\n", pmd_paddr);
> @@ -391,6 +393,7 @@ __vtop4_x86_64(unsigned long vaddr, unsigned long pagetable)
>  	 * Get PTE.
>  	 */
>  	pte_paddr  = pmd_pte & ENTRY_MASK;
> +	pte_paddr = pte_paddr & ~(NUMBER(sme_mask));
>  	pte_paddr += pte_index(vaddr) * sizeof(unsigned long);
>  	if (!readmem(PADDR, pte_paddr, &pte, sizeof pte)) {
>  		ERRMSG("Can't get pte (pte_paddr:%lx).\n", pte_paddr);
> diff --git a/makedumpfile.c b/makedumpfile.c
> index a03aaa1..81c7bb4 100644
> --- a/makedumpfile.c
> +++ b/makedumpfile.c
> @@ -977,6 +977,7 @@ next_page:
>  	read_size = MIN(info->page_size - PAGEOFFSET(paddr), size);
> 
>  	pgaddr = PAGEBASE(paddr);
> +	pgaddr = pgaddr & ~(NUMBER(sme_mask));

Since NUMBER(sme_mask) is initialized with -1 (NOT_FOUND_NUMBER),
if the sme_mask is not in vmcoreinfo, ~(NUMBER(sme_mask)) will be 0.
So the four lines added above need

  if (NUMBER(sme_mask) != NOT_FOUND_NUMBER)
    ...

and, what I'm wondering is whether it doesn't need to take hugepages
into account such as this

392         if (pmd_pte & _PAGE_PSE)        /* 2MB pages */
393                 return (pmd_pte & ENTRY_MASK & PMD_MASK) +
394                         (vaddr & ~PMD_MASK);
"arch/x86_64.c"

Thanks,
Kazu


>  	pgbuf = cache_search(pgaddr, read_size);
>  	if (!pgbuf) {
>  		++cache_miss;
> --
> 2.17.1
> 



_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec



[Index of Archives]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux