Re: [PATCH V2] x86/kexec: fix a kexec_file_load failure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 01/08/19 at 04:51pm, Baoquan He wrote:
> On 01/08/19 at 04:46pm, Dave Young wrote:
> > > Wondering why this place doesn't need the initialization assignment.
> > > Isn't it to assign in all places before kexec_add_buffer() calling?
> > 
> > C designated initializers will make sure to initialize it as zero.
> > We set KEXEC_BUF_MEM_UNKNOWN as 0 so it just works.
> 
> Got it, it works, thanks. People may need check code to find out
> KEXEC_BUF_MEM_UNKNOWN is 0, then realize this fact.

Agreed,  it is not very clear now. It's better to improve it with some explict
initial value since we have the macro.  But since this is a regression
I suggest to fix the bug first, I can send a patch later for the
improvement. 

Thanks!
> 
> Other than this, it looks good to me, ack it.
> 
> Acked-by: Baoquan He <bhe@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Thanks
> Baoquan

_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec



[Index of Archives]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux