Hi Eric,
On 05/23/18 at 10:53am, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Dave Young <dyoung@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > [snip]
> >
> >> >
> >> > +config CRASHKERNEL_DEFAULT_THRESHOLD_MB
> >> > + int "System memory size threshold for kdump memory default reserving"
> >> > + depends on CRASH_CORE
> >> > + default 0
> >> > + help
> >> > + CRASHKERNEL_DEFAULT_MB is used as default crashkernel value if
> >> > + the system memory size is equal or bigger than the threshold.
> >>
> >> "the threshold" is rather vague. Can it be clarified?
> >>
> >> In fact I'm really struggling to understand the logic here....
> >>
> >>
> >> > +config CRASHKERNEL_DEFAULT_MB
> >> > + int "Default crashkernel memory size reserved for kdump"
> >> > + depends on CRASH_CORE
> >> > + default 0
> >> > + help
> >> > + This is used as the default kdump reserved memory size in MB.
> >> > + crashkernel=X kernel cmdline can overwrite this value.
> >> > +
> >> > config HAVE_IMA_KEXEC
> >> > bool
> >> >
> >> > @@ -143,6 +144,24 @@ static int __init parse_crashkernel_simp
> >> > return 0;
> >> > }
> >> >
> >> > +static int __init get_crashkernel_default(unsigned long long system_ram,
> >> > + unsigned long long *size)
> >> > +{
> >> > + unsigned long long sz = CONFIG_CRASHKERNEL_DEFAULT_MB;
> >> > + unsigned long long thres = CONFIG_CRASHKERNEL_DEFAULT_THRESHOLD_MB;
> >> > +
> >> > + thres *= SZ_1M;
> >> > + sz *= SZ_1M;
> >> > +
> >> > + if (sz >= system_ram || system_ram < thres) {
> >> > + pr_debug("crashkernel default size can not be used.\n");
> >> > + return -EINVAL;
> >>
> >> In other words,
> >>
> >> if (system_ram <= CONFIG_CRASHKERNEL_DEFAULT_MB ||
> >> system_ram < CONFIG_CRASHKERNEL_DEFAULT_THRESHOLD_MB)
> >> fail;
> >>
> >> yes?
> >>
> >> How come? What's happening here? Perhaps a (good) explanatory comment
> >> is needed. And clearer Kconfig text.
> >>
> >> All confused :(
> >
> > Andrew, I tuned it a bit, removed the check of sz >= system_ram, so if
> > the size is too large and kernel can not find enough memory it will
> > still fail in latter code.
> >
> > Is below version looks clearer?
>
> What is the advantage of providing this in a kconfig option rather
> than on the kernel command line as we can now?
It is not a replacement of the cmdline, this can be a supplement to
the crashkernel command line. For a lot of common use cases if we have
the auto reservation user just do not need to manually set the cmdline
for example on a virtual machine and usual setup (except of the
comlicate storage and very large machines). The crashkernel=auto
has been used for long time, Red Hat QE tested it on a lot of different
lab machines and proved it works well. Kdump usually just works so admin
do little work to enable kdump.
But the crashkernel=auto implementation has some drawbacks that is it
is more like embed policy in the code and it is not flexible like a
config option.
Thanks
Dave
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
