On 3/2/2018 1:02 PM, Will Deacon wrote: >> How about the points that Baoquan highlighted in his email regarding the >> solution from AMD and X86? > Which specific points do you think this proposal doesn't address? > No specific concerns at this moment. >> I have not read the entire thread but, is this just a matter of following >> what Bjorn recommended or there is more to it? > I'm trying to say how I think Bjorn's idea can be implemented for SMMUv3. > I basically want to avoid a situation where the SMMU driver tries to walk > the in-memory data structures left by a previous kernel and infer the > setup from that. Let me know if you have something to test. We have a test case with the crash. -- Sinan Kaya Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project. _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
