On Fri, 2 Mar 2018 13:46:10 +0100 Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 01:32:52PM +0100, Michal Suchánek wrote: > > On Fri, 2 Mar 2018 17:24:19 +0800 > > Dave Young <dyoung@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > On 02/26/18 at 01:00pm, Michal Suchanek wrote: > > > > Not all architectures implement KEXEC_FILE_LOAD. However, on > > > > some archiectures KEXEC_FILE_LOAD is required when secure boot > > > > is enabled in locked-down mode. Previously users had to select > > > > the KEXEC_FILE_LOAD syscall with undocumented -s option. > > > > However, if they did pass the option kexec would fail on > > > > architectures that do not support it. > > > > > > > > When no option is passed to select one syscall or the other try > > > > KEXEC_FILE_LOAD and fall back to KEXEC_LOAD when not > > > > suported. > > > > > > Again, IMHO the default behavior should not be changed.. > > > > So adding a new option to enable the fallback would be ok? > > I am also wary of changing the default behaviour and > I think a new fallback option would be better. > > Dave? Ok, I will resend with a separate fallback option. Thanks Michal _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
