On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 09:18:07AM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote: > On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 04:37:04PM -0700, David Woodhouse wrote: > > On Wed, 2017-05-17 at 14:51 +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote: > > > The current kexec_iomem_for_each_line() counts up all the lines for which > > > a callback function returns zero(0) or positive, and otherwise it stops > > > further scanning. > > > This behavior is incovenient in some cases. For instance, on arm64, we want > > > to count up "System RAM" entries, but need to skip "reserved" entries. > > > > s/exntend/extend/ and s/incovenient/inconvenient/ but other than that, > > all ten patches > > Tested-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw at amazon.co.uk> > > Thanks a lot! > > > Simon, any chance of a 2.0.15 release once these are merged please? > > For your convenience, you can also find my patch with fixes above: > http://git.linaro.org/people/takahiro.akashi/kexec-tools.git Thanks, I have applied this series with the tags from David (above) and Pratyush (below). Regarding releasing 2.0.15. It should have come out around the same time as v4.11, but I entirely forgot - sorry about that. I will see about getting it released soon with these patches included. > > Thanks for your continued effort on this, Akashi-san. Congratulations > > on finally getting the support merged into 4.12! > > > > I've backported the final set of patches to 4.9 too. That's where I'm > > going to be using it for the moment. In case it's useful to anyone > > else, it's here: > > http://git.infradead.org/users/dwmw2/arm64-kdump-4.9.git > > Great. > Just FYI, we, linaro, will also backport kdump to our lsk v4.4 and v4.9. > > Thanks, > -Takahiro AKASHI > On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 11:52:25AM +0530, Pratyush Anand wrote: ... > Thanks for the v7 updates. I tested this version as well, and it worked!! > Tested-by: Pratyush Anand <panand at redhat.com>
