Hi David, On Mon, 2017-04-10 at 14:19 +0100, David Howells wrote: > Mimi Zohar <zohar at linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > > > From an IMA perspective, either a file hash or signature are valid, > > but for this usage it must be a signature. > > Not necessarily. If IMA can guarantee that a module is the same based on its > hash rather than on a key, I would've thought that should be fine. File hashes can be modified on the running system, so they're normally used,?in conjunction with EVM, to detect off line modification of mutable files and prevent their usage. These patches https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/5/2/465?should provide some of the missing functionality. Mimi
