On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 12:06:54PM -0500, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> This isn't new... there are a number of messages issued in this file
> with that prefix, so I was just following convention.
The "convention" that some of the messages are prefixed and some aren't?
:-)
> Changing the prefix could be a follow-on patch.
Ok. As some of those print statements have prefixes and some don't,
let's unify them.
Thanks.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
