On Mon, 2017-07-03 at 17:41 +0100, Russell King wrote: > On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 06:51:50PM +0900, Hoeun Ryu wrote: > > > > > > > > What about the initrd???Do you want to append that as well? > > I have thought of it. > > I think It would be better to have it. > > But I think this is the first step to do so. > That is something we don't support with the kernel, and would be > insane > to do so - it would mean that the very dumb decompressor would have > to relocate not only the dtb image, but also the initrd image to > some other part of memory.??It moves the appended dtb image along > with > the rest of the zImage as one complete blob, but that doesn't work > so well for an appended initrd.??It will also be rather slow. > > So I'd like to continue my discouragement of this entire approach and > say that kexec-tools should *not* add support for an appended DTB nor > an appended initrd. > > The kernel build process gives you the kernel image and dtb file. > The appended-dtb image support that we have in the kernel is for > backwards compatibility with non-DT aware boot loaders that only > know how to deal with one or two images at boot time. > I understand and respect your opinion. Thank you for the review.
