Hi, On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 09:46:21PM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote: > +static int __init early_init_dt_scan_usablemem(unsigned long node, > + const char *uname, int depth, void *data) > +{ > + struct memblock_region *usablemem = (struct memblock_region *)data; Nit: unnecessary cast. > + const __be32 *reg; > + int len; > + > + usablemem->size = 0; Could we please lift this assignment/initialisation into the caller... > + > + if (depth != 1 || strcmp(uname, "chosen") != 0) > + return 0; > + > + reg = of_get_flat_dt_prop(node, "linux,usable-memory-range", &len); > + if (!reg || (len < (dt_root_addr_cells + dt_root_size_cells))) > + return 1; > + > + usablemem->base = dt_mem_next_cell(dt_root_addr_cells, ®); > + usablemem->size = dt_mem_next_cell(dt_root_size_cells, ®); > + > + return 1; > +} > + > +static void __init fdt_enforce_memory_region(void) > +{ > + struct memblock_region reg; ... e.g. have: struct memblock_region reg = { .size = 0, }; That saves us from making unnecessary assignments to the size field, and makes it clear that reg.size has definitely been initialised, regardless of what of_scan_flat_dt() happens to do. With that: Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland at arm.com> Thanks, Mark. > + > + of_scan_flat_dt(early_init_dt_scan_usablemem, ®); > + > + if (reg.size) > + memblock_cap_memory_range(reg.base, reg.size); > +} > + > void __init arm64_memblock_init(void) > { > const s64 linear_region_size = -(s64)PAGE_OFFSET; > > + /* Handle linux,usable-memory-range property */ > + fdt_enforce_memory_region(); > + > /* > * Ensure that the linear region takes up exactly half of the kernel > * virtual address space. This way, we can distinguish a linear address > -- > 2.11.0 >