Hi Simon, Thanks for your review comment. On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 1:38 PM, Simon Horman <horms at verge.net.au> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 07:41:52AM +0530, Pratyush Anand wrote: >> >> >> On Wednesday 23 November 2016 07:33 AM, Dave Young wrote: >> >>Although this is very unlikely that a hardware will support only 16K page >> >>> sizes, however it is possible. Therefore, its better to keep it disabled by >> >>> default. >> >If it is *unlikely* it could be better to make it as default and add a >> >--disable-dcache instead. >> > >> >> I think, I can do that. > > Can this be detected at run-time? Thats doable. OK, so if everyone agrees then I can send a V2 where neither --enable-dcache nor --disable-dcache will be used. It will enable dcache if 4K/64K page is supported and will do nothing otherwise. ~Pratyush
