On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 01:51:53PM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote: > Add memblock_cap_memory_range() which will remove all the memblock regions > except the range specified in the arguments. > > This function, like memblock_mem_limit_remove_map(), will not remove > memblocks with MEMMAP_NOMAP attribute as they may be mapped and accessed > later as "device memory." > See the commit a571d4eb55d8 ("mm/memblock.c: add new infrastructure to > address the mem limit issue"). > > This function is used, in a succeeding patch in the series of arm64 kdump > suuport, to limit the range of usable memory, System RAM, on crash dump > kernel. > (Please note that "mem=" parameter is of little use for this purpose.) > > Signed-off-by: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi at linaro.org> > Cc: linux-mm at kvack.org > Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm at linux-foundation.org> > --- > include/linux/memblock.h | 1 + > mm/memblock.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/include/linux/memblock.h b/include/linux/memblock.h > index 5b759c9..0e770af 100644 > --- a/include/linux/memblock.h > +++ b/include/linux/memblock.h > @@ -334,6 +334,7 @@ phys_addr_t memblock_start_of_DRAM(void); > phys_addr_t memblock_end_of_DRAM(void); > void memblock_enforce_memory_limit(phys_addr_t memory_limit); > void memblock_mem_limit_remove_map(phys_addr_t limit); > +void memblock_cap_memory_range(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size); > bool memblock_is_memory(phys_addr_t addr); > int memblock_is_map_memory(phys_addr_t addr); > int memblock_is_region_memory(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size); > diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c > index 7608bc3..eb53876 100644 > --- a/mm/memblock.c > +++ b/mm/memblock.c > @@ -1544,6 +1544,34 @@ void __init memblock_mem_limit_remove_map(phys_addr_t limit) > (phys_addr_t)ULLONG_MAX); > } > > +void __init memblock_cap_memory_range(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size) > +{ > + int start_rgn, end_rgn; > + int i, ret; > + > + if (!size) > + return; > + > + ret = memblock_isolate_range(&memblock.memory, base, size, > + &start_rgn, &end_rgn); > + if (ret) > + return; > + > + /* remove all the MAP regions */ > + for (i = memblock.memory.cnt - 1; i >= end_rgn; i--) > + if (!memblock_is_nomap(&memblock.memory.regions[i])) > + memblock_remove_region(&memblock.memory, i); > + > + for (i = start_rgn - 1; i >= 0; i--) > + if (!memblock_is_nomap(&memblock.memory.regions[i])) > + memblock_remove_region(&memblock.memory, i); > + > + /* truncate the reserved regions */ > + memblock_remove_range(&memblock.reserved, 0, base); > + memblock_remove_range(&memblock.reserved, > + base + size, (phys_addr_t)ULLONG_MAX); > +} This duplicates a bunch of the logic in memblock_mem_limit_remove_map. Can you not implement that in terms of your new, more general, function? e.g. by passing base == 0, and size == limit? Will