Hi Dave, On 17/05/16 06:42, Dave Young wrote: > Marc, it has been discussed for long time, I think kdump code can be > logically splitted from this series so that we can get the kexec > done first? The basis for kexec are already on their way to mainline, as part of the hibernate series that James has put together. I'd expect someone to: 1) rebase the remaining kexec/kdump patches based on the current arm64/for-next/core, 2) post these patches when -rc1 gets cut in two weeks from now, 3) address the review comments in a timely manner, 4) update the series once a week so that we see some actual progress If this happens, I can't see any reason why this code wouldn't get merged. But keeping kexec and kdump together is not what has prevented the code from getting merged until now. Thanks, M. > > On 04/01/16 at 11:39am, Geoff Levand wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Fri, 2016-04-01 at 09:59 +0800, Dave Young wrote: >>> Geoff, for easier to review maybe you can send kexec patches first >>> then AKASHI Takahiro >>> can send the kdump patches as a standalone patchset? >> >> Marc Zyngier specifically asked for an integrated set >> of patches for easier review. I will keep it that way >> for now. >> >> -Geoff > -- Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
