Hello Minfei, How do these two patches work? -- Thanks Zhou On 03/18/2016 01:48 PM, "Zhou, Wenjian/???" wrote: > On 03/18/2016 12:16 PM, Minfei Huang wrote: >> On 03/18/16 at 10:46am, "Zhou, Wenjian/???" wrote: >>> Hello Minfei, >>> >>> Since I can't produce the bug, I reviewed the patch and wrote an increment patch. >>> Though there are some bugs in the increment patch, >>> I wonder if the previous bug still exists with this patch. >>> Could you help me confirm it? >> >> Ok. I will help verify this increasing patch. >> > > Thank you very much. > >>> >>> And I have another question. >>> Did it only occur in patch v4? >> >> This issue doesn't exist in v3. I have pasted the test result with >> --num-thread 32 in that thread. >> >> applied makedumpfile with option -d 31 --num-threads 32 >> real 3m3.533s > > Oh, then the patch in the previous mail may not work. > > I'm appreciated if you can also test the patch in this letter. > > I introduced semaphore to fix the bug in the v3. > So I want to know if it is this which affects the result. > The attached patch is based on v4, used to remove semaohore. > > > > _______________________________________________ > kexec mailing list > kexec at lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec >
