Am Mittwoch, 29 Juni 2016, 15:47:51 schrieb Dave Young:
> On 06/28/16 at 07:18pm, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote:
> > diff --git a/include/linux/kexec.h b/include/linux/kexec.h
> > index e8acb2b43dd9..e16d845d587f 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/kexec.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/kexec.h
> > @@ -146,7 +146,30 @@ struct kexec_file_ops {
> >
> > kexec_verify_sig_t *verify_sig;
> >
> > #endif
> > };
> >
> > -#endif
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * struct kexec_buf - parameters for finding a place for a buffer in
> > memory + * @image: kexec image in which memory to search.
> > + * @mem: On return will have address of the buffer in memory.
> > + * @memsz: Size for the buffer in memory.
> > + * @buf_align: Minimum alignment needed.
> > + * @buf_min: The buffer can't be placed below this address.
> > + * @buf_max: The buffer can't be placed above this address.
> > + * @top_down: Allocate from top of memory.
> > + */
> > +struct kexec_buf {
> > + struct kimage *image;
> > + unsigned long mem;
> > + unsigned long memsz;
> > + unsigned long buf_align;
> > + unsigned long buf_min;
> > + unsigned long buf_max;
> > + bool top_down;
> > +};
>
> Rethink about the first patch, you dropped the user buffer in kexec_buf
> But later your passing IMA digests buffer patchset may need use it.
>
> So keep it in kexec_buf should be better.
I'm not following. The IMA buffer patchset doesn't use kexec_locate_mem_hole
nor struct kexec_buf.
> For the IMA buffer patchset I'm still reading and learning the
> background, will reply them later.
Thank you!
[]'s
Thiago Jung Bauermann
IBM Linux Technology Center
